When can the findings of fact be based on evidence?

The findings of fact can be based on evidence when that evidence is admissible. This is because admissible evidence meets the legal standards required to be considered by a court or tribunal in making determinations about the facts of a case. In legal proceedings, only evidence that is deemed admissible by the judge or hearing officer can be used to support factual conclusions, ensuring that the findings are both reliable and grounded in law.

Admissibility often hinges on a variety of factors, including relevance, authenticity, and adherence to procedural rules. If evidence is found to be inadmissible, it cannot play a role in the determination of facts, thus any findings based on such evidence would not hold up under scrutiny.

Other potential moments for considering findings of fact, such as during hearings or referencing previous rulings, are contextually limited in their relevance to the admissibility of evidence. The fundamental principle remains that without admissible evidence, factual conclusions cannot be appropriately supported.