What type of liability is not relieved under subsection (1) of the immunity clause?

The correct answer identifies liability related to torts committed by specific officials as the type of liability that is not relieved under subsection (1) of the immunity clause. This clause typically provides certain protections or immunities from liability for actions taken in the course of their duties, but it does not extend these protections to all categories of official conduct.

In this context, a tort generally refers to a wrongful act leading to civil legal liability. When specific officials commit torts — behavior deemed intentional or negligent — they can be held accountable even if they are carrying out their official duties. This maintains a level of accountability and protection for individuals who may suffer harm as a result of such wrongful actions.

The other options refer to various types of liability that have different levels of immunity or are under different statutes or regulations. Liability for independent contractors often falls outside of the direct responsibility of officials, liability for business malpractice is typically governed by commercial law rather than tort law, and personal liability of the Minister would also have specific protections under certain conditions. However, the real focus of the immunity clause in this instance is on ensuring that certain tort actions are not shielded from accountability, particularly when they reflect misconduct by specific officials. This is crucial for maintaining trust in governance and upholding legal standards