What is the limitation of the immunity clause regarding the Crown and municipalities?

The immunity clause regarding the Crown and municipalities indicates that while they may have certain protections against legal action, they are not entirely shielded from liability. Specifically, they remain liable for torts committed by their officials in the course of their duties, which emphasizes the importance of holding government entities accountable for wrongful acts that cause harm. This is crucial in ensuring that individuals have a recourse for grievances and can seek compensation when wronged by governmental actions.

The other options suggest absolutes that do not accurately reflect the legal framework surrounding governmental liability. For example, the idea that they are entirely free of liabilities ignores the established principle that government bodies can be held responsible in certain circumstances. The suggestion that they are not subject to any form of regulation overlooks the significance of laws and regulations governing their operations. Similarly, the claim that liabilities are transferred to the chief building official fails to recognize that while officials may act within their role, the accountability generally resides with the municipality or Crown itself, not merely an individual official.