What can the Divisional Court do upon hearing an appeal?

When the Divisional Court hears an appeal, it has the authority to confirm or alter the decision made by the lower court judge. This means that the court can either uphold the original ruling if it finds that the lower court applied the law correctly and reached a reasonable conclusion, or it can change the outcome of the decision if it identifies errors in the application of the law, factual findings, or legal principles involved in the case.

This process is a critical aspect of the appellate system, as it allows for review and correction of lower court decisions, ensuring that justice is served accurately and fairly. The ability to confirm or alter a decision reflects the court's role in interpreting the law and maintaining legal consistency across cases.

The other options refer to actions that are outside the standard authority of the Divisional Court in appealing decisions. For example, ordering a new hearing or disallowing further appeals are functions that may lie within different legal jurisdictions or stages of the judicial process. Likewise, automatically reinstating a previous decision does not align with the discretionary powers of the Divisional Court, which must assess each case based on its merits.